Martin Luther’s Unregeneracy Further Exposed in His Vile Hatred for the Jewish People (Hitler’s Motivations), vs Franz Delitzsch, a German Scholar Who Loved the Jews

Early morning of Nov 10th, 88 years ago, we find the anniversary of the infamous event known as Kristallnacht (literally, the night of broken glass), which occured in 1938, the birth pangs of World War II, when Jewish synagogues and businesses were burned, all carried out as a symbolic act of Martin Luther’s birthday, the beginning of Hitlers cleansing of 6 million Jews from Europe. You see, Martin Luther was born on Nov 10th, and he was highly esteemed in the eyes of the leader of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, also known as the Nazi Party, which we all know to be one Adolf Hitler. You could say, Luther was like a godfather to Hitler, who held heavy influence on Nazi policy.

Going back over 300 years from that day and into the 16th century, we find Martin Luther (Nov 1483 - Feb 1546) plotting an escape from the clutches of Rome, but not from the clutches of eternal damnation. Luther, the seminal figure of the Protestant Reformation, a German priest, theologian, author, hymnwriter, professor, and former Augustinian friar, was excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) in 1521, four years after he penned his 95 Theses, and condemned as an outlaw by the RCC at the Diet of Worms. Thats not a bad title to have when given by the great whore and mother of all harlots, but sadly Luther did not divest himself of some of Rome's doctrines.

Many people have a very inaccurate view of the theology of the reformers. These teachings are swept under a rug as much of history continues to be white washed in our churches. Concerning Martin Luther, one of the most influential figures in modern Christian history and the father of the heretical and apostate Lutheranism, they are unfamiliar with what he truly believed concerning the gospel, the Bible, the Jewish people, and other doctrines, and that is because they mostly obtain their history from sanitized and hagiographical Protestant sources. They are completely ignorant to his Cathechisms, and his anti-Semitic works. Many Protestants have the false and misconceived notion that men like Luther saved the gospel. Whatever the alleged “brave” reformers saved, they did not save the gospel in their era or any other. The message of God has never been lost (Lk 1:70). The old fable that the RCC extinguished the light of the saving gospel and hundreds of years later the Reformers renewed it again, as is often heard, is a gross untruth! (The gospel has NEVER been lost; its always been propagated by the true stream of churches, the Baptist and Anabaptist stream, which existed alongside the false, mammoth stream of false and apostate churches, with Rome at the helm, and her harlots riding her coattails, which includes all the demominations and sects of the world, including Protestantism.) Luther embraced a false gospel of works, which included baptismal regeneration, exposed here, denial and hatred towards many books of the Bible, exposed here, continued to embrace many Catholic heresies, exposed here, and had a deep, vile and satanic hatred for the Jewish people, exposed here in this report. The reverence we often find for the so-called reformers is really strange. It is odd, like a modern day case of cognitive dissonance.

Martin Luther, whom is called the great reformer, initially put on a show and false pretence of embracing the Jewish people (even writing a tract about it) but when they went against him, rejecting his message, his true colours came out, which was one of vile hatred and violence towards these peoples, as it was towards the Anabaptists later. This exposed Luther’s true narcissistic and selfish motivations. Any true born again believer knows that vast majority of Jewish people will reject the truth in our present day, because God has providentially blinded their eyes (Rom 9, 11:8-10), but they also know that the Jew is the natural branch of the olive tree (Rom 11:11-24) and remains God's chosen people, the Fathers beloved (Rom 11:28), and will ultimately be saved when Israel turns to the Lord Jesus Christ during the 70th week of Daniel, aka., the Great Tribulation.

Below you will find maybe some surprising utterances of Luther, which are difficult to come by. The Catechisms of this "great man" are easy to find, but even the highly sanitized anthologies of his work are difficult to locate. Why the scarcity of Luther's writings in mainstream Protestantism? I cannot speak from first-hand knowledge, but if you read the statements below, you may suspect that Luther has been silenced because his true beliefs and theology and views is an embarrassment to his followers. They would much rather propagate the image of the benevolent bombast, the passionate leader, the enlightened patriarch — because if the people really knew what Luther thought and taught, they would be appalled. In our report, Martin Luther — A True Born Again Believer or a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing?, we cover a number of his theological heresies, whereas this report focuses mainly on his inflammatory views towards the Jewish people.

Martin Luther's Judenschriften

Martin Luther had two distinct periods of Judenschriften. The first came early on post-departure from the RCC, and the latter, a few decades after. In his early writings, for instance the 1523 treatise “Jesus Christ Was Born a Jew,” Luther adopted a conciliatory tone toward the Jewish people. Elements of the booklet recommended better and kinder treatment of Jews for the puporse of facilitating conversion, though not primarily written for that purpose. Luther believed if the Jews were freed from Catholic oppression, they would accept Christ as the Messiah.

Twenty years later, the true colours of Martin Luther would spill out (though we would argue, his true colours were always showing to those with any sense of discernment), as they always do, at least conerning the matter of the Jew (which subject takes up more of the Bible than any other), the false teacher exposed as the dog and pig that he is (2 Pet 2:22), a "natural brute beast" (2 Pet 2:12) and "servant of corruption" (2 Pet 2:19):

"While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire." (2 Pet 2:19-22)

In the 1540's the vile and satanic hatred that lived in Luthers heart spilled out in his rage against the Jewish people, showing forth his embracement of the "doctrine of Balaam" (Rev 2:14; Ju 1:11; 2 Pet 2:15), "cast[ing] a stumblingblock before the children of Israel" (Rev 2:14). Luther went from some false pretence of caring for the Jews to one of staunchly expressed anti-semitic views, calling for the expulsion of Jews and the burning of synagogues. But that Satanic hatred he had towards those unlike himself, was expressed already long before that to a different people, in fact the year after writing his initial booklet on the Jewish people where he expressed kindness towards them. In precise similitude of his contemporary mainstream heretical haters, namely John Calvin and Ulrich Zwingli, he poured hate and severe persecution on those who disagreed with him, including professing Christians who looked to him as a Christian example (so much for Jn 13:35 and Matt 5:43-48). He taught that dissenters should be banished and violently punished. In 1524, during the War of the Peasants or the Peasants War (see also here among many articles written on the subject), during which the peasants saw Luther as their hero and were inspired by the reforms of Luther, he condemned the peasants' revolt and called for its brutal suppression, arguably enabling the bloody demise of more than 100,000 peasants. Luther got violent in his writing concerning the Peasants, which was horribly hypocritical considering he had attempted to discourage any violence or uprisings by the Peasants, only to turn around and call for the same violence against the Peasants themselves. But of course we know, heretics and false believers/teachers are always hypocrites, blind to their wicked hypocrisy, false judgers, and lovers of their own belly (Rom 2:1-5; 16:17-18; Matt 23; Phil 3:18-19; 2 Tim 3:1-9; etc). His incendiary tract, Against the Murderous and Thieving Hordes of Peasants, published in May 1525, laden with foolish, ungodly and wicked statements, influenced and contributed to this bloody slaughter in 1525. In it he wrote,

"Therefore, let everyone who can, smite, slay, and stab, secretly or openly, remembering that nothing can be more poisonous, hurtful, or devilish than a rebel. It is just as when one must kill a mad dog; if you do not strike him, he will strike you, and a whole land with you."

Killing peasants was not murder to Luther, as he justified his satanic hatred, but destroying a mad dog:

"To kill a peasant is not murder; it is helping to extinguish the conflagration. Let there be no half measures! Crush them! Cut their throats! Transfix them. Leave no stone unturned! To kill a peasant is to destroy a mad dog!” – “If they say that I am very hard and merciless, mercy be damned. Let whoever can stab, strangle, and kill them like mad dogs” (Erlangen Vol 24, p. 294)

“The peasants [involved in the Peasants’ War] would not listen; they would not let anyone tell them anything; their ears must be unbuttoned with bullets, till their heads jump off their shoulders. . . . On the obstinate, hardened, blinded peasants, let no one have mercy, but let everyone, as he is able, hew, stab, slay, lay about him as though among mad dogs, . . . so that peace and safety may be maintained . . .” (ibid)

Luther also said of Roman Catholic leaders,

“If I had all the Franciscan friars in one house, I would set fire to it . . . To the fire with them!”

Wow, wasn't he Mr. Nice Guy, an exemplar of Christian conduct! Maybe this is Luther's version of loving thy neighbour as thyself. Unsurprising that he turned to the devils drink for most of his life, abetting his escape from this life through self-murder. It sure appears like the Reformers had a problem with violence and hatred! (John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli). More of Rome that never left these wicked hypocrites.

Luthers same hatred towards the Jews was simply another manifestation of his allegiance to self and Satan.

When the Jewish people refused to embrace Christianity, Luther turned violently against them. He had murderous hatred towards Jews that went almost beyond belief. In the 1540's, his works were laden with violent and hateful sentiment towards the Jews. He published a flurry of intensely anti-Semitic treatises namely: “On the Jews and their Lies,” “On the Ineffable Name,” and “The Last Words of David,” containing some of the harshest anti-Semitic invective written by a so-called Christian, and a leader at that! The former, “On the Jews and their Lies,” was likely his worse.

In 1543 he published the treatise titled "On the Jews and Their Lies," where he openly expressed his satanic hatred towards the chosen people of God:

“First to set fire to their synagogues or schools and to bury and cover with dirt whatever will not burn, so that no man will ever again see a stone or cinder of them. This is to be done in honour of our Lord and of Christendom, so that God might see that we are Christians, and do not condone or knowingly tolerate such public lying, cursing, and blaspheming of his Son and of his Christians . . . [Jewish] houses also be shattered and destroyed . . . Let their prayer books and Talmuds be taken from them, and their whole Bible too; let their rabbis be forbidden, on pain of death, to teach henceforth any more. Let the streets and highways be closed against them. Let them be forbidden to practice usury, and let all their money, and all their treasures of silver and gold be taken from them and put away in safety. And if all this be not enough, let them be driven like mad dogs out of the land.” (Will Durant, About the Jews and Their Lies, 1543, pp 211-212)

In this booklet, Luther called the Jews:

• “Poisonous, devilish, and evil people”

• “A blasphemous burden” on Christian society

• “Thieves and robbers” who should be expelled or destroyed

  
  

Luther advocated violence against Jews, urging rulers to:

• Burn synagogues and Jewish schools and cover the remains with dirt.

• Razing and destroying their homes.

• Confiscate Jewish religious books.

• Prohibit rabbis from teaching on pain of death.

• Abolishing safe-conduct for Jews and prohibiting them from travel.

• Confiscating all their wealth (silver and gold) and using it to support converts.

• Forcing young, strong Jews to perform manual labor.

• Expel Jews from Christian lands

Now who does that remind you of?? If that sounds a lot like Hitler, it’s because Hitler and Luther actually had a lot in common when it came to the Jews. The only difference is that Hitler actually carried it out. Hitler took that advice to heart, who together with Adolf Eichmen, the architect, put into action their plan to rid the world of the Jews, first using them for forced manual labour, robbing them of their wealth, and ultimately expelling them from the earth by fire. But it started with Kristallnacht, Jewish homes, synagogues and businesses razed and destroyed, destroying the credibility of the Jewish people by lies and falsehoods and turning the German Gentiles against them, confiscating Jewish religious books, abolishing safe-conduct for Jews and prohibiting them from travel.

Its not difficult to perceive where this severe anti-semitism would end up. Inevitably it would lay the groundwork for Adolf Hitler, a Lutheran who read Luther a few centuries later, to flame his anti-semitic hatred, and work his Jew-killing machine during World War II. In light of Luthers hatred for the Jews and his violent writings, he had a widespread complicity and role in the eventual Holocaust a few centuries later under Hitler. In what ways did Luther influence Nazi's anti-semitic ideology?

• Adolf Hitler praised Martin Luther in Mein Kampf, calling him a great reformer.

• Nazi propaganda used Luther’s writings to justify anti-Jewish policies.

• Kristallnacht (Nov 10, 1938), when Jewish synagogues and businesses were burned, was carried out on Martin Luther’s birthday as a symbolic act.

Julius Streicher, the publisher of the commonly referenced National Socialist (i.e., the Nazi Party) newspaper Der Stürmer during the Nazi period, would often reference Luther’s Judenschriften. As noted for instance in Eric Gritsch's Martin Luther’s Anti-Semitism: Against His Better Judgement (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012, p. 115) — while on trial at Nuremberg, Steicher claimed that if the prosecution considered these writings (Judenschriften), Luther would be on trial instead of him.

In that same year, 1543, in Luther's "Tischreden" ("Table Talk") he is to have stated:

"The Jews are the most wicked, obstinate, and devilish people that ever were upon the earth . . . I would not have them live, if it were in my power."

In another place he wrote,

"If I had to baptise a Jew, I would take him to the bridge of the Elbe, hang a stone round his neck and push him over with the words `I baptise thee in the name of Abraham'” ("The Facts About Luther," 1987, p. 290; Grisar, “Luther”, Vol. V. p. 413)

And yet another:

"Jews are young devils damned to hell."  ("Luther's Works," Pelikan, Vol. XX, p. 2230)

Yikes. No murderous hatred to be seen here. Evidently, the anti-Semitic charge against Luther is not anti-Lutheran propaganda. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that Martin Luther had a vile and demonic hatred towards God’s chosen people, the Jews. Perhaps this would be natural for one who had the same evil attitude towards the Word of God (many books of the Bible he despised and rejected). Luther wrote absolutely terrible and horrible things about the Jewish people. His vicious hatred was more so than any other German “theologian” since his day, and he would have undoubtedly and gladly killed them all given the opportunity. Thus it is unsurprising to see this same hatred among his faithful 21st century followers, especially Reformed Calvinists. Is it any surprise that those who love Calvin, love Luther? Two peas in a pod with almost identical violent murderous knee-jerk tendencies and false gospels.

It is very disturbing to contemplate the possible corrupt fruit born of the seeds of hatred sown by this wolf in sheep's clothing. If he was guided by any spirit, clearly it was not holy.

Thankfully not every German is like Luther. There is Franz Delitzsch.

Franz Delitzsch

Franz Delitzsch was a scholar, particularly a Hebrew scholar, and a beloved friend of the Jews, who translated the NT into Hebrew through great labour. Many have expressed the possibility that Delitzsch was a Jew himself without his knowledge, and though that could be true, it is not necessary to conclude why he loved the Jewish people so. Franz Delitzsch’s genuine and deep love for the Jewish people started when he was converted, though he had an affection for the Jewish people prior to that, with two Jews living in his own home. One of Delitzsch’s friends, a man named Schütz, had a great concern for Delitzsch’s soul. Schütz had a great love towards Christ, and longed for Delitzsch to be delivered from the dangerous rationalism in which he had immersed himself upon attending higher learning. Delitzsch resisted for a long time, but then Christ delivered him. He later wrote concerning his moment of salvation,

"This very day I could point out the place (in one of Leipzig’s) streets where a light from above put me into the same state as Thomas when he exclaimed ‘My Lord and my God!’ Henceforth I became a theologian, and familiar with students who had been awakened by the mercy of God … the years from 1832 to 1834, my last three years at the university, were the happiest of my life; they were the spring of my spiritual life, the days of my first love.”

The exemplary Trinitarian Bible Society has produced a documentary on the life and work of Delitzsch, and from the years 2010 to Oct 2025 they revised Delitzsch’s NT, bringing it into closer conformity with the Greek Received Text and presenting it in a more accessible form of Hebrew. Here is the documentary, well worth your time:

Truly Saved People Love the Jewish People, Regardless of Their Beliefs or Behaviours

We love Israel. We have loved Israel since we was born again. Before that, due to a severe lack of discernment and absence of true wisdom, the water was muddied and difficult to determine where to stand on the Israel issue. Though a defence of Israel would be made, it lacked knowledge, boldness, courage and wisdom. True supernatural conversion changed all this. Blinded eyes were opened permanently, the confused mind brought to precision distinctness, discernment and discretion, and understanding of the truth to 20/20 clarity. We went from a position of neutraility to a sacrificial love for the Jewish people, defending them to the death, in spite of not knowing any actual Jews in the present world, only those in Scripture, of whom our Lord and Saviour rises above all. The Jewish people in our present world and found in Israel, are indeed the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, they are the Israelites, Gods chosen, elect people, the descendants of the 12 tribes of Israel. No, that doesn’t mean they have some special get-out-of-jail-free card to get them into heaven, spontaneously saved because of their national election; no, they are not, but it does mean that God has covenants with them and they are beloved by the Father (Rom 11:28) and under His special care.

Frankly, if you oppose Israel, you oppose the God of Israel. The Lord Jesus Christ is the Holy One of Israel. He is the pillar of fire by night, and the cloud by day. If you reject the Israelites, the Jewish people, you do not know the God of the Bible. People that actively despise or hate the Israelites or Christian Zionism are unregenerate and Satanic heretics. Period. One of the very first things that transpires in true salvation is a love for the Jewish people, and for many reasons (e.g. Rom 9:3-4) including the fact that our Lord Jesus Christ was born of Jews; He was a Jew, He came to earth primarily for His own people, the Jewish people, to "save his people from their sins." (Matt 1:21). "His people" here in Matt 1 and most of Scripture, refers NOT to Gentiles, but to the Jewish people.

But God's people rejected His Son, and we do not take that lightly. He came to His own (Matt 1:21) and His own received Him not (Jn 1:11). When they rejected their Messiah (Matt 23:37-39), Christ blinded their eyes and shut their ears (Rom 11:7-10), and turned to the Gentiles (Rom 11:11), for a season, until the fulfness of the Gentiles come in (Rom 11:12-, 25), which is the Great Tribulation, the 70th week of Daniel (Dan 9:24-27; Rev 4-20).

"What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded (According as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear;) unto this day. And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumblingblock, and a recompence unto them: Let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back alway. I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy. Now if the fall of them be the riches of the world, and the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles; how much more their fulness?" (Rom 11:7-12)

We are well aware that Israel continues in her rebellion against God just as surely as when Jeremiah or Isaiah preached 2,600 years ago, and as surely as when Christ blinded her nearly 2,000 years ago. But yet we love Israel beyond any simple explanation, and we look forward to her salvation in the Great Tribulation, when Israel will indeed look upon Him “whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his own son” (Zech 12:10).

We don't think for a second that the Jewish people are some innocent group of people. They are rejectors of the gospel of Christ and they are responsible for the death of Christ, their Messiah. The Jewish leaders led the campaign to kill Jesus and they manipulated the Roman governor Pontius Pilate to have him executed even though Pilate said Jesus was innocent. But the truth is, Jesus wasn’t only killed by the Jews but also by the Gentiles (Matt 27:15-26). The Roman government was equally responsible, but so was every sinner who has ever lived, for He suffered and died as a sacrificial offering to God for all of man’s sin. Yet the Hebrews remain the covenant people of God, the children of Israel, the future children of God, when they turn from their broken cisterns to the life-giving words of the living God. And we love them. The Land of Israel, the Jew and the Covenants of God vs Replacement Theology (a Doctrine of Devils).

The reason why so many people don't get it and remain steadfast in their hate and spite for the Jewish people, often cloaked in a veneer of piety (e.g., replacement theology), is because they are unsaved, they are unregenerate, they are wicked false pretenders, which means they can’t even understand the situation since their eyes are blind, ears closed, and heart unconverted, thus their philosophy is almost entirely driven by their own fleshly opinion and by false teachers such as Martin Luther. This is the crux of the anti-semitism problem in our world today. They read the Bible (many times a perverted version of the Bible), but do not fully understand and comprehend what they are reading. They are unable to rightly divide the word of truth (2 Tim 2:15), thus falsely divide it and privately interpret Scriptures (cf. 2 Pet 1:20), that is, interpret scripture in isolation and at the expense of sound doctrine harmonized throughout all of Scripture, which teaches one interpretation, one doctrine. They are unable to properly interpret Scripture and truly understand the deep things of God because they are without the indwelling Spirit of God, the absolute critical key to truly knowing what God's Word says concerning any subject, including Israel, and thus force their own or someone elses perverted teaching or tradition upon Scripture. Only the new birth can deliver the foolish, the simple and the scorner (Pr 1:20-32).

Conclusion

As you have likely judged for yourself, Luther was a very troubled, surly, intemperate — and even blasphemous — man. Hardly the picture of a Spirit-led leader of the faith. Anything good that Luther might have written or allegedly did is completely offset and nullfied by his heresies, blasphemous heresies, false gospel, and satanic hatred towards God's chosen people. The strength of a chain is determined by its weakest links. He repeatedly exposed himself to be nothing less than a counterfeit, false teacher and charlatan, in many, many ways. In fact, he was a wolf in sheep's clothing. No amount of sugar-coating or rewriting history changes these facts. This is NOT someone that anyone should get their theology or hermeneutics from, nor look up to. He needs to simply be exposed for the wolf that he was.

The issue exposed in this report further dispels any question as to why Luther had such great doubt of salvation, since he never owned it to begin with. He was a counterfeit, of whom it is written, "while the kind of doubt which assailed such people as Luther and even at times John Wesley himself results in a loss of the hope of salvation” (Mark A. Noll, “John Wesley and the Doctrine of Assurance,” Bibliotheca Sacra. 132:526, April 1975, p. 171).

Indeed, because both these men never had salvation to begin with. What they had was reformation, but not transformation. (We expose Wesley here).

Yet the Reformed and Calvinist crowd have a greatly vested interest in keeping Luther “saved.” To them it’s either Protestanism or Catholicism, so if they lose on Luther, they lose the Protestant label and their bladder, and Catholicism has apparently won. This is the deluded mentality of this almost entirely unregenerate group with all its sects, and its the same mentality that drives such heresies as all are either one of two prevailing philosophies: “Calvinism” or “Arminianism.” Unfortunately, majority of reformers and calvinists approach the truth with preconceived philosophies and doctrine, and then bend the Scriptures and facts to fit their own deluded position. Hence the severe man-centeredness.

It is an outright shame that any church teaches to honour this man. Sure Luther stood against the tyranny of Catholicism in his day, but he continued to embrace many of Catholicisms doctrines of devils.

Many professing believers are horrified that we would dare expose Martin Luther, that alleged great reformer, the father of the Protestant Reformation, the man who allegedly turned from works to faith. None of these proclamations are actually true of Luther, but we have no issue with criticism, positive or negative (though we do have issue with lies, false conceptions, and logical fallacies), so we thought we ought to briefly explain the rationale.

Public error or sin by the influential, or any professing Christian teacher in a public fashion and the greater realm of the world (either through screen or printed page) requires public exposure. That is an absolute since God demands it (e.g., Rom 16:17-18; 2 Tim 3:8-9). Unrepentant public sin or error that influences a non-private audience, never requires private correction. Private sin or error can be handled by private intervention (Lk 17:3-4), but not public. This is illustrated throughout Scripture. E.g. Paul publicly exposed 10 men by name for error and sin that wasn’t even public, in 1 and 2 Timothy alone. In probably all of these cases, they were guilty of much less than Luther. This is the example of Scripture, buttressed by specific command. If we are truly born again, we are obligated to obey what Scripture says, not follow our own opinions or feelings, whether or not it’s found to be offensive. This is how sin, error, false teachings/teachers is stopped (Ti 1:9-16), and souls saved from destruction and eternal damnation:

“Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.” (Jam 5:19-20)

This is also critical to mitigate the spread of leaven: be it sin (1 Cor 5:6) or error (Gal 5:9).  ‘But it will create division.’ Regardless, there is a purpose. Truth MUST be divided from error, and all influential sin and error must be exposed. Jesus proclaimed,

“Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division:" (Lk 12:51)

People really ought to be more concerned about offending God, than offending man. Way to much leaven and error is running rank amongst fundamentalism and evangelicalism, so that its gone mostly apostate. For further readings on our rationale, why exposing and warning is a critical necessity, along with other concerns, accusations and rebuttals — by way of Q&A, please see: Answering False Accusations of Warring Spiritual Warfare